About Me

I'm the President of LaserNetworks, North America's largest independent MPS Reseller. My team and I are focused on continuing LaserNetworks's innovation and leadership across the company's core business of its MPS Cost Per Page® program, established in 1996. 

I am also a founding member of the MPSA and currently sit on the board. 

Subscribe

Your email:

The Future of Managed Print Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Constrained Product

  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook | Submit to Digg digg it |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Constrained Product....is this a forecasting ‘miss' on the part of tech companies or the new norm of their Supply Chains?

It's the expectation of our clients that we'll continually monitor their printer fleet and identify ‘outlier' products that require attention...ranging from additional service monitoring, cascading printers, and the outright replacement/upgrade of an existing asset.  It's also the expectation of our clients that these replacements, once identified, take place within a fairly narrow window.  3-5 business days has been the typical turnaround time over the past several years.

Well, things started to change a few months ago...call it June, 2009.  Product began to become scarce.  Forecast expectations of the hardware companies increased.  Initially, we thought this to be an issue with our friends at Distribution (our go-to partners are Techdata & Synnex).  However, upon closer review, it appeared to be the hardware companies...they had turned off the manufacturing tap.  Right off!

June shortages included paper trays, finishers, and the occasional MFP device.  By October, it had spread to 30% of the MFP line for some of our top partners.  By December, the constrained product toped out at 50% of the line & you could add toner to the list.  Yes, toner!!  So, our customers didn't receive their new product(s) in a timely fashion...or if they did receive their product(s), they may not have the ‘juice' to run it.  

And while HP is the leader in the print world & absolutely has been faced with these issues, it has included our partners at Lexmark (product) and Xerox (product & toner).

 

Time for the team to work overtime!  In every case, LaserNetworks was able to find a workaround solution that satisfied the client.  These workarounds have included supplying Reflexion toner  and souring current model printers that had been ‘previously enjoyed'.  These demo/used devices were often accessed through companies that had downsized or fell into bankruptcy.  The result was a solution to the customer that addressed their needs, often at a lower total cost than the unavailable new product/toner solution.  With the support of our very understanding clients & awesome employees, we have been leveraging our significant presence and knowledge of the North American channel to overcome these challenges.

 

While it's unclear if these constraints have become the new trend in the marketplace, it does highlight customer benefits realized by partnering with an independent company, not ‘constrained' by internal product shortages.  When Plan A is broken, it's great that we have a Plan B or Plan C, that when combined with great clients and great employees, creates a new solution that may provide more value to the client than the original Plan A. 

 

As a final note, in speaking with many of our clients, it appears this constraint issue runs deeper than the print/copier market, and right through the IT space.  As we are hearing word from Forrester of a strong uptick in IT spending during 2010 (optimistic perhaps?), hopefully the hardware providers will update their forecasts accordingly.   http://seekingalpha.com/article/182180-forrester-it-spending-in-u-s-to-jump-6-6-percent-in-2010

 

It will be interesting to see if Plan B become the new Plan A in 2010 and beyond.

Comments

This is not a blip, or even a trend, it is now a characteristic. 
 
 
 
I just did a quick analysis of my MPS Engagements. 
 
 
 
My current ratio is 6.5:1. For every new device I place, I am removing 6.5 other devices - could be fax, scanner, single function, MFP, or traditional copier. 
 
 
 
We did not lose a client, we reduced their dependence on so many devices. 
 
 
 
HUH. 
 
 
 
MPS reduces costs by reducing machines in the field. 
 
 
 
Contraints only help this along.
Posted @ Monday, January 25, 2010 6:16 PM by Greg Walters
Thx for the comment, Greg.  
 
 
 
Absolutely true consolidation of products fits with the evolution of technology. However, I'm hard-pressed to go to step 2 where a drastic reduction in devices is a requirement to show a cost savings to the client. Certainly our model doesn't punish the customer for 'sharing the risk' across more devices. 
 
 
 
From my perspective, the idea that fewer devices equals a significant reduction in costs doesn't match, especially when you consider the cost of reduced productivity. 
 
 
 
 
 
Fewer devices results in an increased dependance for the remaining devices to work, not to mention the cultural challenges. So, when that copier-based MFP goes down (which it will), the user needs to walk to the other end of the floor, or the next floor, to complete/pick up their job.  
 
 
 
We see Real GDP growth stalled at 2% over the longterm due to our inability to increase worker productivity. My sense is putting your eggs into one centralized basket won't help. 
 
 
 
As for the constraints, it's been painful. Given your estimated 6.5:1, you'd like to think those hardware companies would still have a few devices in the barn to support the ongoing needs of the customer???  
 
 
 
Thx again for the feedback...and great work onwww.deathofthecopier.com. 
 
 
 
 
 
Posted @ Monday, January 25, 2010 7:29 PM by Brian Stevenson
Great article, very interesting reading.
Posted @ Friday, July 16, 2010 11:39 AM by kenny gravitt
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics